Democracy Improvement Ranking 2012* |
|
|
Democracy Improvement
Gain/Loss |
Democracy Improvement
Gain/Loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank Change |
Score |
|
|
|
2007-2011 |
2007-2011 |
|
1 |
Tunisia |
+9 |
8.1 |
|
2 |
Bangladesh |
+12 |
6.3 |
|
3 |
Libya |
+2 |
4.1 |
|
4 |
Zambia |
+2 |
3.6 |
|
5 |
Pakistan |
+2 |
3.6 |
|
6 |
Moldova |
+8 |
3.3 |
|
7 |
Tanzania |
+3 |
3.1 |
|
8 |
Georgia |
+9 |
2.7 |
|
9 |
Togo |
0 |
2.7 |
|
10 |
Kenya |
+1 |
2.7 |
|
11 |
Egypt, Arab Rep. |
+2 |
2.3 |
|
12 |
Singapore |
+2 |
2.2 |
|
13 |
Benin |
+1 |
2.1 |
|
14 |
Thailand |
+4 |
2.0 |
|
15 |
Macedonia, FYR |
+5 |
2.0 |
|
16 |
Belgium |
+3 |
1.9 |
|
17 |
Indonesia |
+2 |
1.9 |
|
18 |
Philippines |
+1 |
1.9 |
|
19 |
Mongolia |
+3 |
1.9 |
|
20 |
Brazil |
+1 |
1.8 |
|
21 |
Ghana |
+4 |
1.6 |
|
22 |
Haiti |
-2 |
1.6 |
|
23 |
Lebanon |
-1 |
1.5 |
|
24 |
Panama |
+1 |
1.4 |
|
25 |
Korea, Rep. |
+5 |
1.4 |
|
26 |
India |
+5 |
1.4 |
|
27 |
Costa Rica |
+6 |
1.3 |
|
28 |
Paraguay |
+3 |
1.3 |
|
29 |
Germany |
+1 |
1.3 |
|
30 |
Poland |
+4 |
1.2 |
|
31 |
Serbia |
+1 |
1.2 |
|
32 |
Norway |
0 |
1.1 |
|
33 |
Timor-Leste |
-3 |
1.1 |
|
34 |
Guatemala |
+3 |
1.1 |
|
35 |
Mauritius |
0 |
1.1 |
|
36 |
Nigeria |
0 |
1.1 |
|
37 |
Bolivia |
0 |
1.0 |
|
38 |
Romania |
0 |
1.0 |
|
39 |
Switzerland |
0 |
1.0 |
|
40 |
Austria |
+1 |
1.0 |
|
41 |
Canada |
+1 |
0.9 |
|
42 |
Japan |
+1 |
0.9 |
|
43 |
Chile |
+4 |
0.9 |
|
44 |
Malaysia |
+1 |
0.8 |
|
45 |
Uruguay |
+2 |
0.8 |
|
46 |
Argentina |
0 |
0.7 |
|
47 |
Croatia |
+1 |
0.7 |
|
48 |
Australia |
-1 |
0.7 |
|
49 |
China |
-1 |
0.7 |
|
50 |
Namibia |
-2 |
0.7 |
|
51 |
Senegal |
+1 |
0.6 |
|
52 |
Nepal |
-1 |
0.6 |
|
53 |
El Salvador |
+1 |
0.6 |
|
54 |
Finland |
0 |
0.6 |
|
55 |
Colombia |
0 |
0.5 |
|
56 |
Trinidad and Tobago |
+1 |
0.5 |
|
57 |
Albania |
-1 |
0.5 |
|
58 |
Lesotho |
-2 |
0.5 |
|
59 |
Mozambique |
-1 |
0.4 |
|
60 |
Nicaragua |
-1 |
0.4 |
|
61 |
Cyprus |
+2 |
0.3 |
|
62 |
Armenia |
-2 |
0.3 |
|
63 |
Denmark |
0 |
0.3 |
|
64 |
Netherlands |
0 |
0.3 |
|
65 |
Yemen, Rep. |
-1 |
0.2 |
|
66 |
United States |
-1 |
0.2 |
|
67 |
Kyrgyz Republic |
-3 |
0.2 |
|
68 |
Slovenia |
0 |
0.2 |
|
69 |
Kuwait |
+1 |
0.2 |
|
70 |
Ireland |
-1 |
0.2 |
|
71 |
Bosnia and
Herzegovina |
-1 |
0.2 |
|
72 |
Portugal |
0 |
0.1 |
|
73 |
Morocco |
-1 |
0.1 |
|
74 |
New Zealand |
0 |
0.0 |
|
75 |
Russian Federation |
-3 |
0.0 |
|
76 |
Turkey |
-3 |
0.0 |
|
77 |
Peru |
-1 |
-0.2 |
|
78 |
Jamaica |
-2 |
-0.3 |
|
79 |
Sweden |
0 |
-0.4 |
|
80 |
United Kingdom |
-3 |
-0.4 |
|
81 |
Israel |
-1 |
-0.4 |
|
82 |
Czech Republic |
-1 |
-0.4 |
|
83 |
Spain |
0 |
-0.5 |
|
84 |
South Africa |
-7 |
-0.5 |
|
85 |
Syrian Arab Republic |
-1 |
-0.6 |
|
86 |
Ecuador |
-1 |
-0.6 |
|
87 |
Venezuela, RB |
-7 |
-0.6 |
|
88 |
Botswana |
-5 |
-0.6 |
|
89 |
Slovak Republic |
+1 |
-0.7 |
|
90 |
Bulgaria |
-3 |
-0.7 |
|
91 |
Estonia |
-3 |
-0.9 |
|
92 |
France |
0 |
-1.1 |
|
93 |
Lithuania |
-4 |
-1.2 |
|
94 |
Dominican Republic |
-2 |
-1.2 |
|
95 |
Guinea-Bissau |
-3 |
-1.2 |
|
96 |
Mexico |
-4 |
-1.3 |
|
97 |
Greece |
-2 |
-1.7 |
|
98 |
Italy |
-6 |
-1.7 |
|
99 |
Sri Lanka |
-6 |
-1.7 |
|
100 |
Ukraine |
-8 |
-1.7 |
|
101 |
Latvia |
-4 |
-2.2 |
|
102 |
Honduras |
-6 |
-2.3 |
|
103 |
Bahrain |
-6 |
-2.5 |
|
104 |
Hungary |
-5 |
-2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Green: Country is among the 10
best |
Green:
Country has gained in rank since the previous period |
Green:
Gain of democracy score |
|
|
|
White:
Country's rank has remained stable over the two periods |
|
|
|
Red:
Country is among the 10 worst |
Red:
Country has lost in rank since the previous period |
Red:
Loss of democracy score |
|
|
|
Grey: "Virtual scores" for countries, |
|
|
categorized by Freedom Hous as |
|
|
"not free" in the years 2010 and 2011. |
|
|
Tunisia is
categorized by Freedom |
|
|
House as "partly free" in 2011. |
|
|
|
David F. J. Campbell |
|
|
University of Klagenfurt |
|
|
Faculty for Interdisciplinary Studies (iff) |
|
|
Institute of Science Communication and Higher Education
Research (WIHO) |
|
|
david.campbell@uni-klu.ac.at |
|
|
http://www.uni-klu.ac.at/wiho |
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Pölzlbauer |
|
|
p.poelzlbauer@gmx.at |
|
|
|
|
|
Thorsten D. Barth |
|
|
thorsten.d.barth@gmail.com |
|
|
|
|
|
Georg Pölzlbauer |
|
|
poelzlbauer@ifs.tuwien.ac.at |
|
|
|
|
|
Recommended citation:
Campbell, David F. J. / Paul Pölzlbauer / Thorsten D. Barth / Georg
Pölzlbauer (2012). Democracy Improvement Ranking 2012 (Scores). Vienna:
Democracy Ranking. |
|
|
* The Democracy
Improvement Ranking 2012 compares the democracy ranking scores of 2007-2008
and 2010-2011. |
|
|
|
|
|